Archive for March 6th, 2012

Follow Yahoo!’s The Daily Ticker on Facebook here! Stocks fell sharply Tuesday, putting the Dow on track for its worst single-day decline of 2012. In recent trading, the Dow was down more than 200 points, or 1.64%, while the S&P 500 was lower by 1.65% and the Nasdaq was off 1.59%. The downturn follows sharp [...]

More…

Comments No Comments »

Toledo, Ohio — “It’s fun again,” said Joe Choate, manager of the sprawling General Motors powertrain plant in this city on the shores of Lake Erie. Near death in 2009, when GM filed for bankruptcy, the plant went down to a skeleton crew of about fifteen employees, as the factory and the local economy shifted [...]

More…

Comments No Comments »

Last week I wrote about the the difference between the skills required in the early days of a company when innovation is the biggest driver of value and the skills required later on when execution and exploitation become more important. My conclusion was that the skills are very different, but that it is increasingly important that the capacity to innovate is retained, and that hiring a professional CEO (by which I mean execution focused) can be a mistake.

One thing I didn’t talk about was the value a founder brings to the business and the post sparked a Twitter conversation with @tewy on the merits of Zuckerberg’s approach of bringing in a professional COO. My final contribution to that exchange was to say that keeping the founder in the company is the best solution, ideally as CEO.

Today I watched the interview below with Ben Horowitz of hot Silicon Valley VC firm Andreessen Horowitz (AH) in which Ben talks about how VCs have traditionally brought in professional CEOs for their networks of customers and potential hires, I guess in addition to their execution skills, although Ben doesn’t mention that. AH have set out their stall as being very pro-founder because part of their mission is to help create some lasting companies with the scale of Amazon, Facebook, Salesforce, Google or Microsoft, and as Ben notes that all those companies, and the majority of other large companies that have stood the test of time, were run by their founders for a large number of years. He thinks that is because founders have a number of advantages that brought in CEOs can never match, namely, deep knowledge of the company, authority with employees, and commitment to a long term strategy/vision.

AH’s approach is to help founders grow into large company CEOs by having people on the AH payroll that help founders build out their networks, i.e. a high expense, high value-added model. As per Martin Stillman’s comment on my last post on this subject, in addition to helping building investors can also mentor founders to become better at execution, either themselves, or by encouraging the use of third party mentors.

I think that as the pace of change continues to increase innovation skills will only become more important and hence a bias in favour of founders will become more commonplace. However, as Ben also notes, this isn’t the same as saying the founder is always going to be the best person to run a company.

The video is 19mins and if you haven’t got time to watch it all the key section starts around 3mins in.



More…

Comments No Comments »

The drama over Greece’s bailout comes to a head this week. Debt holders have until Thursday to accept or reject the “voluntary” 53.3% haircut on their Greek holdings. If less than 75% of bondholders reject the terms, Greece will be considered in default, which would be the first sovereign default in the eurozone. The good [...]

More…

Comments No Comments »